The needed tools to disassemble the cylinder head have been acquired and this will take place in the next couple of days. In the meantime, I've been trying to remove the cylinder from the crank case.
The left piston is rust-welded to the cylinder wall. Wednesday I filled the that cylinder with PB Blaster, hoping that it would free the piston. No such luck. I have removed the retaining nuts and bolts and freed the cylinder from the crank case and elevated it about an inch, where it is now supported by blocks and wedges. I spent about an hour today bang away at the piston with a 5lb mallet cushioned with a block of wood, but to no avail the piston is still stuck. Next I'm going to try an air chisel fitted with a drift pin to see if that can break the hold of the rust.
Lifting the cylinder off the crank case shows that at least the crank shaft will turn and that is not rusted solid.
I've been able to determine that I'm the 4th owner of this bike, recently I tracked down the original owner hoping he would take a bit of time to answer a few questions about the bike.
Readers familiar with Norton Commandos will not right away that the frame has been heavily modified to approximate the design of the legendary Norton Featherbed frame. Commenters at the
AccessNorton forum expressed concern that about its rigidity, so this was a primary question that I had. The friend who I bought the Norton from, mentioned that the engine had been modified and I was curious as to if any light could be shed on the nature of the modifications.
The original owner and the person who completed the modifications is the owner of a well known manufacturer of motorcycle accessories. He told me that the frame works well and was stiffer than the stock Commando frame. He also gave me an overview of the motor.
It has been bored out to 906cc, the head ported and polished with big valves installed. The whole thing was balanced and blueprinted and built with light weight pistons and valve train. His recollection is that the motor was producing about 90hp and 75 ft/lb of torque when he had the bike.
Jim